AJMERUL NISHA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.
BAIL/9238/2025 · 2025-10-30
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177660 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177660 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9238 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Counter affidavit filed today is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
3. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 187 of 2025, under Sections 80(2), 85 BNS and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, P.S. Musafirkhana, District Amethi.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that co accused Abdul Rauf who is the father in law has been enlarged on bail vide order dated 14.10.2025 passed in Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 9758 of 2025. The applicant is mother in law.
5. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances and adopting the same reasoning, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 17.7.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
7. Let the applicant Ajmerul Nisha be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on her furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Faizal Hashmi, Raj Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Pintoo, Ravindra Yadav Ajmerul Nisha .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which she is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 30, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 9238 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench