- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:2699 WP No. 47413 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 47413 OF 2017 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI AJAY.M.S. AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, S/O SUDHAKARAN, RESIDING AT NO.G1, 1ST FLOOR, PREMISES NO.21, NEW GANGAMMA TEMPLE STREET, MEESE MUNIYAPPA LAYOUT, MAHADEVAPURA, BANGALORE-560 048. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SRINIVASAN.T., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE FEDERAL BANK LTD., VIGAN NAGAR BRANCH, NO.2 AND 5, SANDS PLAZA, VIGNAN NAGAR MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE-560 037. REPRESENTED BY ITS SENIOR MANAGER. 2. THE AUTHORISED OFFICER, THE FEDERAL BANK LTD., BANASWADI BRANCH, NO.13, BANASWADI MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE-560 043. 3. M/S SAI MAADHA ENTERPRISES NO.89/2, VAYUPUTHIRA NILAYA, NEAR A.NARYANAPURA GOVT SCHOOL, DHOORVANI NAGAR POST, MUNISHWARA CIRCLE, Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:2699 WP No. 47413 of 2017 BANGALORE-16. REPRESENTED BY PROPRIETOR, SRI. M.G.MANIKANTAN. 4. SRI.M.G.MANIKANTAN S/O M.V.GOPALAN, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.21, MEESE MUNIYAPPA LAYOUT, GANGAMMA TEMPLE STREET, MAHADEVAPURA, BANGALORE-560 048. 5. SMT. CHINNU MANIKANTAN W/O MANIKANTAN, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, NO.21, SOUPARMIKA, MEESE MUNIYAPPA LAYOUT, GANGAMMA TEMPLE STREET, MAHADEVAPURA, BANGALORE-560 048. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. JEEVAN KUMAR.B.S., ADVOCATE FOR R1 & 2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Jeevan Kumar.B.S., counsel for respondents 1 and 2 has appeared in person. 2. The Possession Notices dated:15.07.2016 & 18.09.2017 vide Annexures-A & B are called into question in this - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:2699 WP No. 47413 of 2017 Writ Petition on several grounds as setout in the Memorandum of Writ Petition. 3. Heard the arguments and perused the Writ papers with care. 4. Counsel Sri.Jeevan Kuamr.B.S., submits that the loan account has been closed. Counsel therefore, submits that an appropriate order may be passed. The oral submission made by counsel for respondents 1 & 2 is placed on record. 5. Because of the closure of the loan account, nothing survives for consideration in the Writ Petition at this juncture. 6. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 4