SRI. K MURALI v. M/S PIRAMAL CAPITAL AND HOUSING FINANCE LTD.,
WP/6217/2024 · 2025-03-10
M Nagaprasanna
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17764 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17764 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:11060 WP No. 6217 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 6217 OF 2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
SRI. K MURALI S/O KRISHNAPPPA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 13/49 14TH CROSS, KOTHANURR MAIN ROAD, J.P NAGAR 7TH PHASE, PUTTENAHALLI, BENGALURU-560 078. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAVI M R., ADVOCATE) AND:
M/S PIRAMAL CAPITAL AND HOUSING FINANCE LTD., (EARLIER KNOWN AS DEWANA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION LTD.,) HAVING ITS BRANCH OFFICE AT NO. 13, OLD NO. 05, 1ST MAIN ROAD, VASANTH NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 052.
REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER, MR. ANAND KUMAR …RESPONDENT
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DTD. 09.02.2024 PASSED BY THE II ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, BENGALURU VIDE ANNX-C AS NOT SUSTAINABLE IN LAW AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENT OR ANY ONE CLAIMING FROM THEM BE IT THEIR SUBORDINATES, ADVOCATE COURT COMMISSIONER OR THE POLICE NOT TO TAKE POSSESSION OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IN PURSUANCE OF THE IMUGNED
ORDER.
Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:11060 WP No. 6217 of 2024
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
ORAL ORDER The case is called twice today. There was no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
2. This Court on 08.04.2024, passed a peremptory order, which reads as follows:
“Finally ten days time is granted to comply with the office objections. If the objections would still remain uncomplied, the petition should be dismissed for its non-prosecution.” Even today, office objections are not complied with. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for its non-prosecution.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
BK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 208