Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010183282025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4883/2025 RANIMA BEGUM AND 2 ORS W/O- LATE NURUL ISLAM, R/O- HOUSE NO. 190, F.A. ROAD, KUMARPARA, P.S. BHARALUMUKH, DIST. KAMRUP METRO, ASSAM, PIN- 781009. 2: MD. AMAN ISLAM S/O- LATE NURUL ISLAM R/O- HOUSE NO. 190 F.A. ROAD KUMARPARA P.S. BHARALUMUKH DIST. KAMRUP METRO ASSAM PIN- 781009. 3: LIZA RAHMAN D/O- LATE NURUL ISLAM W/O- ARMAN KHAN R/O- KACHARIGAON TEZPUR, SONITPUR ASSAM, PIN- 784001 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06, ASSAM 2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER KAMRUP METRO GUWAHATI DIST. KAMRUP METRO ASSAM PIN- 781036. Page No.# 2/3 3:ADDL. DISTRICT COMMISSIONER KAMRUP METRO GUWAHATI DIST. KAMRUP METRO ASSAM, PIPN- 781036. 4:THE SETTLEMENT OFFICER KAMRUP METRO GUWAHATI DIST. KAMRUP METRO ASSAM 5:THE ASSISTANT SETTLEMENT OFFICER DISPUR REVENUE CIRCLE KAMRUP METRO DIST. KAMRUP METRO ASSAM 6:ON THE DEATH OF KAMALA DEVI HER LEGAL HEIRS SUNIL KUMAR SARAWGI S/O- LATE NEMI CHAND SARAWGI R/O- BULBUL MARKET 5TH FLOOR FANCY BAZAR P.O. AND P.S. FANCY BAZAR DIST. KAMRUP METRO ASSAM, PIN- 781001. 7:SURENDRA KR. SARAWGI S/O- LATE NEMI CHAND SARAWGI R/O- BULBUL MARKET 5TH FLOOR FANCY BAZAR P.O. AND P.S. FANCY BAZAR DIST. KAMRUP METRO ASSAM, PIN- 781001. 8:VIKAS KAMAL SARAWGI S/O- LATE NEMI CHAND SARAWGI R/O- BULBUL MARKET 5TH FLOOR FANCY BAZAR P.O. AND P.S. FANCY BAZAR DIST. KAMRUP METRO ASSAM PIN- 781001 Page No.# 3/3 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H R A CHOUDHURY, MS. R CHOUDHURY,MS. B. HAZARIKA,MD. MEMON AHMED Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, MS. S. SAIKIA(R-7,8),MS. N BORAH,MR S KHOUND,MR. M K CHOUDHURY (R-7,8),FOR CAVEATOR,MR S KHOUND(R-7,8),MS. N BORAH(R-7,8),SC, REVENUE BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 27-08-2025 Heard Ms. R. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Ms. G. Hazarika, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue Department, Shri N. Goswami, learned State Counsel and Shri M. K. Choudhury, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Shri S. Khound, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 6, 7 & 8. At the outset, Ms. Choudhury, the learned counsel has submitted that due to inadvertence, there are certain defects in the writ petition and accordingly she has prayed that she may be allowed to withdraw the same with a liberty to file a fresh. The said prayer is not objected to by the learned counsel for the respondents. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal with liberty as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant