HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10448 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State as well as perused the record. The accused-applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.218 of 2024 under Sections 3/5A/5B/8 U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughters Act, Police Station Tarun, District Ayodhya/Faizabad. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the offence is triable by Magistrate. The applicant has no criminal history. Only because the applicant happens to be the owner of the seized Tata Pickup the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that the applicant has no clue about the misuse of the driver. It is further submitted that the co-accused Navi Sarvar, Jhinkan @ Hridayram and Rajesh Kumar Yadav have been granted bail by coordinate Bench of this Court vide orders dated 19.11.2024, 10.1.2025 and 19.12.2024, copies of the bail orders have been annexed as Annexure No.2 to the bail application. He seeks parity with the bail order of said co-accused persons. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the offence is triable by Magistrate. The applicant is in jail since 19.9.2025. The applicant has no previous criminal history. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Firoz Ahmad Khan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ved Prakash Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) It is further submitted that there is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away after being released on bail or tampering with the witnesses. In case the applicant is enlarged on bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant but could not dispute that it is a case of parity. I have considered the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties as well as perused the record. On due consideration to the facts that the applicant is in jail since 19.9.2025; he has no previous criminal history; the period of incarceration gone into by the applicant; bail orders of the co- accused, named above and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case I find it to be a fit case for enlarging the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed on the ground of parity. Let the applicant Ved Prakash Yadav be released on bail in aforesaid case crime number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court below concerned with the following conditions: (i) The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial. (ii) The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness. (iii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (iv) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail BAIL No. 10448 of 2025 2 and pass orders in accordance with law. (v) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the IPC (now Section 269 BNS). (vi) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. (now Section 84 BNSS)is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the IPC (now Section 209 BNS). It is clarified that the observations made in this order are confined to the present bail application and shall have no bearing on the merits of the trial. November 10, 2025 Madhu D.R/P.S BAIL No. 10448 of 2025 3 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- MADHU KUMARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench