HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6914 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Salik Ram Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. By means of the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India prayer has been made for direction to respondent no. 2 - Additional Commissioner (Administration), Prayagraj Division, Prayagraj, for expeditious disposal of Revision No. 228 of 2025 (Computerized Case No. C 2025020000002028) - Rameshwar Prasad Vs. Shiv Kala and Others, under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 - Additional Commissioner (Administration), Prayagraj Division, Prayagraj, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. At this stage, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach the Court concerned and move an appropriate application detailing urgency for expeditious disposal of Revision No. 228 of 2025 (Computerized Case No. C 2025020000002028) - Rameshwar Prasad Vs. Shiv Kala and Others, under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, along with the order passed by this Court, within two weeks from today, and in case, if such an application is moved, the Court/Authority shall consider and decide the same within three weeks thereafter, and in case, any case for urgency is made out by the petitioner, it shall pass appropriate orders thereupon, and proceed in accordance with law. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merit and the Court concerned shall decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. 7. With the aforesaid observations, the petition is disposed of. November 26, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Salik Ram Tiwari, Arti Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Shiv Kala .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue And 11 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench