Maricharla Satyam Naidu v. State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/10940/2019 · 2025-09-16
B V L N Chakravarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17761 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17761 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010244582019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 10940/2019
Between:
1. MARICHARLA SATYAM NAIDU, S/O. LATE APPALA SWAMY NAIDU, AGED 70 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O. MURGUDEM VILLAGE, AJJADA GRAM PANCHAYAT, BALIGIPETA MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER
AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRA PRADESH POLICE HEAD QYARTERS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALAKONDA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 5. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, RAJAM POLICE STATION, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 6. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, VANGARA POLICE STATION, VANGARA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 2
7. DISTRICT MAGISTRATECUMDISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 8. SUBDIVISIONAL MAGISTRATECUMSUBCOLLECTOR, PALAKONDA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 9. MANDAL EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATECUMTAHSILDAR, VANGARA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 10. MARIDINA SATYANARAYANA, S/O. LATE APPALASWAMY NAIDU, AGED . MAJOR, RIO. D.NO.50- 9-10, P AND T COLONY, BEHIND SFS SCHOOL, SEETHAMMADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 11. MARIDINA LAKSHMI, W/O. SATYANARAYANA, AGED . MAJOR, R/0. D.NO.50-9-10, P AND T COLONY, BEHIND SFS SCHOOL, SEETHAMMADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 12. MARIDINA RAMA MURTHY, S/O.LATE APPALASWAMY NAIDU,
AGED . MAJOR, R/O. D.NO.15-63, SEETHAMMADHARA NORTH EXTENSION, VISAKHAPATNAM. 13. MARIDINA SIMHACHALAM, S/O. LATE AP ALASWAMY NAIDU, AGED . MAJOR, R/O. D.NO.51-17-5, RED CONVERT STREET, TUNI, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 14. SRI MARIDINA BALARAM NAIDU, S/O APPALASWAMY NAIDU, R/O. D.NO.50-79-3/1, SEETHAMPET, VISAKHAPATNAM
15. SMT MARIDINA SAVITHRAMMA, W/O BALARAM NAIDU, R/O. D.NO.50-79-3/1, SEETHAMPET, VISAKHAPATNARR
16. SRI AKKANA YELLAM NAIDU, S/O APPALA NAIDU, R/O. AJJADA VILLAGE, BALIJAPET MANDAL, VIJAYANAGARAM DISTRICT. 17. SMT AKKANA CHALLAMMA, W/O YELLAM NAIDU, R/O. AJJADA VILLAGE, BALIJAPET MANDAL, VIJAYANAGARAM DISTRICT. 3
18. SRI CHANDANAPALLI KRISHNA, S/O NOT KNOWN, R/O. AJJADA VILLAGE, BALIJAPET MANDAL, VIJAYANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the inaction on the part of respondents 2 to 9 on the petitioner's representation dt. 16.06.2019 submitted for initiating proceedings under Chapter VIII, Section 107 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 against the respondents 10 to 18 for their illegal acts thereby causing breach of peace and disturbance to public tranquility at his landed property of Ac.
1.37 cents covered by Survey No. 166 of J.K. Gummada Revenue Village in Vangara Mandal of Srikakulam District, as illegal, irregular, irrational and amounts to non discharge of legal obligation conferred on respondents 2 to 9 under the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and offends Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents particularly the respondents 5, 6 and 9 to initiate proceedings under Chapter-VIII, Section 107 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against respondents 10 to 18 for their illegal acts for causing breach of peace and disturbance to public tranquility at the petitioner's said landed property
4 IA NO: 1 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 9 to consider and initiate necessary legal action on the petitioner's representation dt. 16.06.2019 submitted for initiating proceedings under Chapter-VIII, Section 107 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the respondents 10 to 18 and their henchmen for causing breach of peace and disturbance to public tranquility at his landed property admeasuring Ac. 1.37 cents covered by Survey No. 166 of J.K. (iummada Revenue Village in Vangara Mandal of Srikakulam District, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP)
2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 10940 of 2019 The Court made the following Order: Smt.Nimmagadda Revathi, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, as the sole petitioner is no more. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader representing the State is in attendance. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 17.09.2025 PSA
6 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 10940 of 2019
Date: 17.09.2025 PSA