HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13090 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to concerned authority to provide pension along with all consequential benefits after including services rendered by the petitioner as work-charge to be counted as qualifying service for purposes of pensionary benefits in light of judgment rendered by the Supreme Court in the case of Prem Singh v. State of U.P. and others, Civil Appeal No. 6798 of 2019 as also the judgment of this Court in the case of Jai Ram Sharma v. State of U.P. and others, Writ-A No. 731 of 2024. Further prayer has also been made for payment of pay-scale, Assured Career Progression (ACP) Scheme and other consequential benefits. 3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.1 i.e. State of U.P. through the Principal Secretary, Public Works Department, Civil Secretariat, U.P., Lucknow, - or any other competent authority who shall consider and decide the same, in light of judgment rendered in the case of Jai Ram Sharma (supra), in case it is applicable, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order. 4. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. November 12, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : S.P. Singh Somvanshi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Shiv Murat .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Public Work Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench