Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010183232025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/893/2025 RAJESH KR AGARWALLA S/O LATE MAHABIR PRASAD AGARWALLA, RESIDENT OR RADHIA BABU LANE, A.T ROAD JORHAT, ASSAM VERSUS GOJANAND MUNDA ALIAS GAJANAND MUNDRA AND ANR S/O LATE RAM DAYAL MUNDRA, R/O WARD NO. 6, HOUSE NO. 63, MANIRAM DEWAN PATH, TABIA BABU LANE JORHAT, P.O. JORHAT, P.S. JORHAT, DIST. JORHAT, ASSAM 2:SRI NAND KISHOR MUNDRA S/O LATE RAM DAYAL MUNDRA R/O WARD NO. 6 HOUSE NO. 63 MANIRAM DEWAN PATH TABIA BABU LANE JORHAT P.O. JORHAT P.S. JORHAT DIST. JORHAT ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A M BORA, A K GOGOI(INFORMANT),A GOGOI (INFORMANT),MR. D GAGAI(INFORMANT),MR. M S HUSSAIN(INFORMANT),MR. V A CHOWDHURY(INFORMANT),MR. A M BORA(INFORMANT) Advocate for the Respondent : MR. D BARUAH, MR A K AZAD,MR. P K BORDOLOI,MS. P HANDIQUE,MR. T J MAHANTA Page No.# 2/3 Linked Case : AB/1535/2025 GOJANAND MUNDA @ GAJANAND MUNDRA AND ANR S/O LATE RAM DAYAL MUNDRA R/O WARD NO. 6 HOUSE NO. 63 MANIRAM DEWAN PATH TABIA BABU LANE JORHAT P.O. JORHAT P.S. JORHAT DIST. JORHAT ASSAM 2: SRI NAND KISHOR MUNDRA S/O LATE RAM DAYAL MUNDRA R/O WARD NO. 6 HOUSE NO. 63 MANIRAM DEWAN PATH TABIA BABU LANE JORHAT P.O. JORHAT P.S. JORHAT DIST. JORHAT ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP.B Y THE PP ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR. D BARUAH Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER Date : 19.08.2025 Heard Mr. A.M. Bora, learned Senior counsel assisted by Mr. V.A. Chowdhury, learned counsel for the informant. Also heard Mr. T.J. Mahanta, learned Senior counsel assisted by Mr. D. Baruah, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and Mr. K. Baishya, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State/respondent No. 3. 2. This interlocutory application has been filed on behalf of the informant Rajesh Kr. Agarwalla, whereby he is seeking to be impleaded as respondent No. 2 in the present bail proceeding and prays that he may be allowed to file a written objection in the present case. 3. The impleadment is allowed. The informant may be impleaded as respondent No. 2 in the bail proceeding. The written objection has already been filed and the same is accepted into the record. 4. Accordingly, the I/A stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant