HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9439 of 2017 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Case called out. 2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the State is present. 4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. Consigned to records. November 3, 2025 AKS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Meva Lal Yadav, Madan Gopal Tripathi, Pramod Kumar, Sanjay Kumar Yadav, Vikas Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Amit Kumar Dwivedi, Anshuman Patnaik (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Smt. Indrani .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru M.D. U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench