[2025:RJ-JP:18771] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Third Bail Application No. 5911/2025 Deepraj @ Deepak S/o Bhavuti, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Pagpeeta Ki Jhonpadi, Tan Looloj, Police Station Sapotara, District Karauli (Raj.). (At Present Confined In District Jail Karauli). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Pal Jadoun For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 05/05/2025 1. The accused-petitioner has filed this third bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. arising out of F.I.R. No.115/2024 registered with the Police Station Sapotra, District Karauli (Raj.) for offence under Sections 307, 336, 504 & 506 of IPC. 2. The first bail application bearing No.7968/2024 was dismissed as withdrawn by this Court vide order dated 22.07.2024 with liberty to file fresh bail application after conclusion of the investigation and the second bail application bearing No.11003/2024 has been dismissed by this Court vide order dated 09.09.2024. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present criminal case has been lodged with false and fabricated facts. [2025:RJ-JP:18771] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5911/2025] Learned counsel further submits that it is a case of no injury and the accused-petitioner is in custody since 07.06.2024. He also submits that the trial of the case is likely to take considerable time to conclude, therefore, the present accused-petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner. 5. Heard. 6. Considered the submissions made at bar and so also perused the material made available on record. 7. The complainant witness has already been examined as PW1. As per the statement of complainant witness, no injury has been sustained and in his cross-examination, he has also stated that there are no mark of firearm on the wall. 8. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, so also the statement of the complainant-witness and the fact that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 07.06.2024, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 9. This third bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction [2025:RJ-JP:18771] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5911/2025] of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any other Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /12