PRAMOD TIWARI @ PAMMU v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME CIVIL SECTT. LKO
BAIL/5882/2025 · 2025-10-30
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177589 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177589 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5882 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.248 of 2024, under Sections 302, 201 IPC, Police Station Itiyathok, District Gonda. 3. In terms of the FIR, a missing person report was lodged alleging that the daughter of the informant aged about 17 years was used to talk to some unknown person secretly and subsequently she ran away and her body was found dead. As per the postmortem report, the cause of death was ante mortem hanging and part from the ligature mark, no other injury was observed on the body of the deceased. 4. In the light of the aforesaid, the Counsel for the applicant argues that no material exists to implicate the applicant under Section 302 IPC. 5. From the perusal of the counter affidavit, no material could be decipher so as to implicate the applicant for the offence in question. 6. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 7. Considering the material available on record coupled with the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 08.11.2024, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Naveen Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Pramod Tiwari @ Pammu .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko .....Opposite Party(s)
on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant Pramod Tiwari @ Pammu be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
October 30, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 5882 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench