HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11384 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. Heard learned counsel for the accused-applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. A supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for the applicant is Learned counsel for accused-applicant while pressing the bail application submits that the accused-applicant has been falsely implicated in the instant case as well as in the sole case mentioned in the gang chart. In that case, he has been released on bail. The bail order is on record as Annexure No. 3 to the bail application. Apart from the sole case mentioned in the gang chart, there is one more case pending against the accused applicant in which also he has been granted bail, copy of which is on record as Annexure no. 1 in the supplementary affidavit. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the co-accused Sebu has been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 10.10.2025 passed in criminal misc. bail application No. 9710 of 2025. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks parity with the order of the co-accused. It has been further submitted that applicant is in jail since 12.08.2025 and if facility of bail is granted, there is no apprehension that he will flee from the judicial process and he will abide by the orders passed by the Court below and will co-operate in speedy trial of the case. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but has not disputed the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Zahid Parvez Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sharukh Khan .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) factual submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused- applicant. On due consideration to the bail order of co-accused Sebu, the fact that in the sole case mentioned in the gang chart as well as in one another case, he has been enlarged on bail; apart from that those two cases, there is no other case pending against the applicant and the applicant is languishing in jail since 12.08.2025, I find it to be a fit case for enlarging the applicant on bail on the ground of parity. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed on the ground of parity. Let the applicant Sharukh Khan, involved in Case Crime No.-459/2025, Under Sections-2/3 (1) U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station- Gosaiganj, District-Sultanpur, be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. (iv) The applicant shall submit an undertaking on affidavit in terms of Section 19 (4) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 that he will not indulge in any case for or misuse the liberty of bail. Any other condition(s) which the trial court/concerned court may deem fit and proper, in the circumstances of the case, may also be imposed. It is clarified that the observations made in this order are confined to the present bail application and shall have no bearing on the merits of the trial. November 25, 2025 R.C. BAIL No. 11384 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench