RAM LAKHAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
NABAIL/1603/2025 · 2025-11-06
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177574 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177574 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1603 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant; learned AGA for the State and perused the records.
2. The present application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in Case Crime No. 85/2025, under Sections 281, 105 BNS, P.S. - Nigoha, District - Lucknow.
3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that on 15.05.2025 at about 04 p.m., the applicant was driving vehicle rashly and negligently which thrashed the mother of the informant to which she died and the applicant ran away. Subsequently, the case was converted from 106(1) to Section 105 BNS.
4. Learned AGA opposes the bail application.
5. Considering the allegation, prima facie, making out of case under Section 106(1) is made out, the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on anticipatory bail. The present application for anticipatory bail is accordingly allowed.
6. In the event of arrest, let the applicant - Ram Lakhan be released on anticipatory bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.30,000/- each separately to the satisfaction of Court below concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohd. Ghayasuddin Khan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ram Lakhan .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (d) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. November 6, 2025 Mohit Singh/- NABAIL No. 1603 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench