Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 177567 (ALL)

MOHAMMAD ISRAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO AND 3 OTHERS

BAIL/5967/2025 · 2025-11-04

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5967 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State; Shri Mayank Pandey, learned counsel for the informant and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.70 of 2025, under Section 65(1), 87, 137(2) BNS, Section 3/4 of POCSO Act & Section 3(2)v, 3(2)va of SC/ST Act, P.S. Ahirauli, District Ambedkar Nagar. 3. In terms of the FIR it was alleged that daughter of the informant was enticed by the applicant. Subsequently, in the statement, the victim did not support the prosecution and stated that both of them had gone together to Delhi. She also denied that any physical relations were formed in between them. Tentative age of the victim is around 15 years. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the statement not supporting the prosecution, the applicant who is in custody since 09.03.2025 and has no criminal antecedents, is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Mohammad Israr be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ajay Vikram Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Mayank Pandey Mohammad Israr .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 4, 2025 nishant BAIL No. 5967 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench