NEETU SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO
BAIL/10778/2025 · 2025-11-13
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177566 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177566 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10778 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.620 of 2025, under Section 191(2), 115(2), 351(3), 352, 310(2), 316(2), 111(2)(II), 308(6) BNS, P.S. Purakalandar, District Faizabad/Ayodhya.
3. In terms of the FIR it was alleged that on account of some project being floated, the informant was lured to part with money and some land was also shown and in pursuance to the said, certain money was paid; certain allegations of running a business was also levelled. The co-accused has already been enlarged on bail vide separate orders.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the fact that mainly the allegation was with regard to taking the money and not paying it back, the applicant who is in custody since 18.09.2025, is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Neetu Singh be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vaibhav Srivastava, Vishnu Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Neetu Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko .....Opposite Party(s)
which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 13, 2025 VNP/- BAIL No. 10778 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench