Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 177556 (ALL)

GARIMA GOYAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS

/9284/2024 · 2025-11-20

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9284 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a statement at bar that in the instant case, the investigation has already been concluded and the charge-sheet has been filed against the petitioner. As such the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous. Learned A.G.A. for the State does not dispute the aforesaid facts. In view of the statement made, the present writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous with liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum at appropriate stage. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. November 20, 2025 Arvind Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mahmood Alam, Akil Imam, Mayank Dwivedi, Qambar Husain, Syed Saad Anwar Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Garima Goyal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench