Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 177547 (ALL)

X VICTIM OF CASE CRIME NO. 228/2025 PS KOTWALI RUDAULI DISTT. AYODHYA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/9142/2025 · 2025-11-03

Abdul Moin, Tej Pratap Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9142 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE TEJ PRATAP TIWARI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA for the respondents no.1 to 3. 2. Notice to respondent no.4 is dispensed with in view of order proposed to be passed. 3. Instant petition has been filed praying for a mandamus commanding the respondents to conduct fair and proper investigation in pursuance to FIR No.0228 of 2025, under Section 69, 88, 351(3) of B.N.S., 2023, Police Station Kotwali Rudauli, District Ayodhya. 4. On the other hand, learned AGA on the basis of instructions sent by Sub-Inspector, Police Station Kotwali Rudauli, District-Ayodhya dated 30.10.2025, states that a final report has been prepared in the matter and the same will be submitted soon. 5. Upon the same being pointed out learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not intend to press the writ petition and prays that the same may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Puttu Lal Misra, Prince Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. X Victim Of Case Crime No. 228/2025 Ps Kotwali Rudauli Distt. Ayodhya .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) pursue other remedy as may be available to her under law. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. November 3, 2025 Arti/- CRLP No. 9142 of 2025 2 (Tej Pratap Tiwari,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARTI MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench