HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9294 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Sri Prabhat Shukla, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no.2, which is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. The instant application has been filed with the following prayer:- "Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the entire proceedings of Case No.1208 of 2021, State vs Gaurav Pal and others, Case Crime No.86 of 2020, under section; against petitioner no.1; 498-A, 323, 420, 506 IPC and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act and against petitioner no.2 and 3; 498-A, 420 I.P.C., Police Station Mahila Thana, District Lucknow as well as impugned charge sheet no.01 of 2021, dated 08.04.2021 submitted against the petitioners by the investigating officer in aforesaid case crime number as well as cognizance order as well as summoning order dated 14.09.2021 passed against the petitioners by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division)/FTC, District Lucknow as contained in Annexure No.1 to the instant petition in the light of compromise took place between the parties, in the interest of law and justice." 4. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise which has taken place between the parties is also filed before this Court as Annexure No.3 to the application. 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sudhir Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Gaurav Pal And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And Another .....Opposite Party(s) best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. 6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the trial court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. 7. The court concerned in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 8. For a period of one month, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. 9. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed, if any, to the learned counsel for the applicants, after taking the photocopy of the same. November 4, 2025 Renu/- A482 No. 9294 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RENU AGARWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench