Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 177541 (ALL)

KESHAVRAM v. STATE OF U.P THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME GOVT. LKO.

/11871/2025 · 2025-11-28

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11871 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.250 of 2025 under section 105, 238 BNS, P.S. Kaisarganj, District Bahraich. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the applicant had run the electricity in the fence of his agricultural field and when the husband of the informant who was going toward his agricultural field, he came in contact with with the said electrified wire and died. The cause of death, as per the postmortem report is shock due to electric burn. The counsel for the applicant argues that he has been falsely implicated. 4. Considering the allegation in the FIR, prima-facie, the malice intent for punishing under section 105 BNS is missing, as such, the applicant who is aged about 60 years and is in custody since 24.09.2025 having no criminal history is entitled to bail. Thus the bail application is allowed. 5. Let the applicant Keshavram be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajesh Kumar Awasthi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Keshavram .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Govt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 28, 2025 VNP/- BAIL No. 11871 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench