SADASHIV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
/1294/2025 · 2025-11-19
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177535 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177535 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1294 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. 1.The present anticipatory bail application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in case crime No.2195 of 2009 under sections 121 A and 109 I.P.c., P.S. Kotwali Nagar, district Raebareli. 2.Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State. 3.It is alleged in the prosecution case that the applicant while posted in the police line, Raebareli as Class-IV employee remained absent for 15 days and allegedly was constituting a Union of Class-IV employees of the Police Department. 4.Learned counsel for the applicant submits that offences are triable by Magistrate. The applicant has no criminal history. The charge sheet has been filed. Learned counsel for the applicant undertakes that the applicant shall cooperate in the trial. 5. Learned Addl. Government Advocate has opposed the prayer made by applicant's counsel. 6.Considering the above aspects of the matter, perusal of the record, the applicant was not arrested during investigation, charge sheet has already been filed in the year 2010, prima facie, the allegations in the first Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Deepak Kumar, Rajesh Kumar Anand, Rakesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sadashiv .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
information report lack ingredients to attract offence under Section 121-A I.P.C., the applicant is serving as Cook, the undertaking given on behalf of the applicant that he shall cooperate in the trial, judgment of Supreme Court in Musheer Alam versus The State of U.P. and another 2025 SCC OnLine SC 116 and without entering into the merit of the case, it would be appropriate to grant protection to the applicant. 7. In view of the above, it is provided that the applicant shall surrender before the concerned court within 10 days from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. On such surrender, the applicant shall be released on anticipatory bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial and he will not influence the witnesses.The applicant shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court.
Any other condition which the trial court may deem fit and proper may also be imposed. 8. In case of default, it would be open for the trial court to proceed in accordance with law. 9. The application is allowed accordingly. November 19, 2025 kkb/ ABAIL No. 1294 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench