Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 177533 (ALL)

AVINASH KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. (HOME DEPTT.) GOVT. OF U.P. LKO. AND OTHERS

/11144/2025 · 2025-11-27

Pramod Kumar Srivastava, Rajiv Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11144 of 2025 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a statement at the Bar that he does not want to press this writ petition and seeks to withdraw it with liberty to file fresh with better particulars. 3. In view of the statement made, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. November 27, 2025 Nadim Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Avinash Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. (Home Deptt.) Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NADIM ALAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench