RAHUL KHARE v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
NA528/2168/2025 · 2025-12-16
Divesh Chandra Samant
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177528 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177528 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 2168 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE DIVESH CHANDRA SAMANT, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. Vakalatnama filed by Sri Rakesh Chandra Rastogi, Advocate on behalf of Opposite Party No.2 is taken on record. 3. The present application has been filed to quash the entire proceeding of Criminal Case No. 54141 of 2025 (State versus Rahul Khare) arising out of case crime no.59 of 2025, under Sections 69, 123, 351(2) BNS, Police Station- Gudumba, District Lucknow, pending before the II ACJM, Lucknow as well as impugned charge sheet dated 16.04.2025 and cognizance order dated 23.05.2025. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that now parties have entered into compromise, therefore, this Court may please to quash the proceeding for which learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 has no objection. 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the Court below as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. 6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it within two weeks, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise with two weeks. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pradeep Kumar Verma, Akash Verma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rahul Khare .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. 7. The court in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 8. For a period of one month, the proceedings of the aforesaid case shall remain stayed. 9. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed to the learned counsel for the applicants, if any, after taking the photocopy of the same.
December 16, 2025 I.A. Siddiqui NA528 No. 2168 of 2025 2 (Divesh Chandra Samant,J.) Digitally signed by :- IMRAN AHMAD SIDDIQUI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench