1 2025:CGHC:18628 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2020 of 2025 1 - Parmeshwari W/o Late Sukhlal Aged About 60 Years Caste- Gond, R/o Village Amalbhitthi, Tehsil- Lakhanpur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh 2 - Hiramati W/o Late Arjun Singh Aged About 38 Years Caste- Gond, R/o Village Amalbhitthi, Tehsil- Lakhanpur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh 3 - Virendra Singh S/o Late Arjun Singh Aged About 20 Years Caste- Gond, R/o Village Amalbhitthi, Tehsil- Lakhanpur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh 4 - Anju Singh D/o Late Arjun Singh Aged About 18 Years Caste- Gond, R/o Village Amalbhitthi, Tehsil- Lakhanpur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh 5 - Surendra Singh S/o Late Arjun Singh Aged About 16 Years Minor Through His Mother Hiramati W/o Late Arjun Singh (Petitioner No. 2), Caste- Gond, R/o Village Amalbhitthi, Tehsil- Lakhanpur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh 6 - Sanju Singh D/o Late Arjun Singh Aged About 14 Years Minor Through Her Mother Hiramati W/o Late Arjun Singh (Petitioner No. 2), Caste- Gond, R/o Village Amalbhitthi, Tehsil- Lakhanpur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh 7 - Khutti S/o Late Dharamsai Aged About 55 Years Caste- Gond, R/o Village Amalbhitthi, Tehsil- Lakhanpur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2025.04.25 15:44:43 +0530 2 8 - Chalittar S/o Late Balakaran Aged About 65 Years Caste- Gond, R/o Village Amalbhitthi, Tehsil- Lakhanpur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Hirmaniya W/o Late Kumar Singh Aged About 65 Years Caste- Gond, R/o Village Amalbhitthi, Tehsil- Lakhanpur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh 2 - Vijayraj Singh S/o Late Kumar Singh Aged About 48 Years Caste- Gond, R/o Village Amalbhitthi, Tehsil- Lakhanpur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh 3 - Vimla D/o Late Kumar Singh Aged About 50 Years Caste- Gond, R/o Village Amalbhitthi, Tehsil- Lakhanpur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh 4 - Seema D/o Late Kumar Singh Aged About 45 Years Caste- Gond, R/o Village Amalbhitthi, Tehsil- Lakhanpur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh 5 - Ramayana Devi W/o Late Tulsi Aged About 60 Years Caste- Gond, R/o Village Amalbhitthi, Tehsil- Lakhanpur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh 6 - Surendra S/o Late Tulsi Aged About 28 Years Caste- Gond, R/o Village Amalbhitthi, Tehsil- Lakhanpur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh 7 - Suresh S/o Late Tulsi Aged About 22 Years Caste- Gond, R/o Village Amalbhitthi, Tehsil- Lakhanpur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh 8 - Commissioner Surguja Division Ambikapur (C.G.) 9 - S.D.O. (R) Udaipur District Surguja (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. Nishi Kant Sinha, Advocate For State/Respondent/s : Mr. Khulesh Sahu, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad 3 Order on Board 24/04/2025 1. Heard Mr. Nishi Kant Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Mr. Khulesh Sahu, learned Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent/s. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner at the very outset fairly submits that the petitioners are having alternative remedy to challenge the order passed by the Commissioner, Surguja Division before the Board of Revenue. 3. The argument advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner has not been opposed by the learned counsel for the respondent- State. 4. Considering the above facts, at this juncture, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to avail the alternative remedy available under law. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Ravi Mandavi