SIRAJ AHMAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME, LKO. AND OTHERS
/11352/2025 · 2025-12-02
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177507 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177507 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11352 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. appearing for the respondents No.1 to 4.
2. The instant petition has been filed praying for a mandamus commanding the respondents No.2 & 3 to conduct an independent enquiry into the illegal and arbitrary act of locking the petitioner's premises on 12.11.2025 by the respondents No.5 & 6 as well as to unlock the business premises.
3. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the respondents No.5 & 6 are unnecessarily interfering in the business premises of the petitioner and have locked the same.
4. Responding to the aforesaid, the learned A.G.A. states on the basis of instructions sent by Shri Mahendra Saroj, Sub-Inspector, P.S. Kotwali Akbarpur, District Ambedkar Nagar dated 02.12.2025 that the authorities are not interfering in any manner in the business premises of the petitioner rather the business premises are in fact being operated by the petitioner himself.
5. The aforesaid statement is recorded.
6. The writ petition stands disposed of. December 2, 2025 S. Shivhare
Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bajhul Quamar Siddiqui Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Siraj Ahmad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench