NEERAJ KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO
BAIL/462/2025 · 2025-11-10
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177503 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177503 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 462 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.304 of 2024, under Sections 191(2), 103(1), 333 of BNS, Police Station Unchahar, District Raebareli.
3. It is argued by the Counsel for the applicant that on the same allegation, the co-accused, namely, Ramakant and Pramod Kumar have been enlarged on bail by this Court vide orders dated 27.10.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.12893 of 2024 and Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.4508 of 2025 respectively. The criminal history of the applicant has been duly explained.
4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer.
5. Considering the fact that the allegations against the applicant to be similar to the co-accused, who have been enlarged on bail and adopting the same reasoning contained in the orders dated 27.10.2025 coupled with the fact that the applicant is languishing in jail since08.11.2024, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail on the ground of parity. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Neeraj Kumar be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Praveen Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Mahesh Kumar Sharma Neeraj Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko .....Opposite Party(s)
reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 10, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 462 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench