Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 177499 (ALL)

POONAM SINGH AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

/8788/2025 · 2025-11-26

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8788 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit alongwith compromise filed by learned counsel for the applicants is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Ajay Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Anand Mani Tripathi, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Anurag Tripathi and Sri Bhupendra Prakash, learned counsel for the private respondent and learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. This application has been filed with the following prayer:- "To quash the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 3356 of 2023 arising out of Case Crime No. 302 of 2023, under Sections 279, 427, 323, 504 I.P.C. and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) SC/ST Act, Police Station- P.G.I., District- Lucknow and to set aside the orders dated 16.11.2023, 20.02.2024 and consequential order dated 20.03.2024 passed by the Special Judge S.C./S.T Act, District-Lucknow, whereby bailable warrant has been issued against the petitioners." 4. The parties are present today and they have no objection with regard to quashing of the proceedings. 5. Learned counsel for the applicants and learned counsel for the private respondent jointly submit that the compromise dated 26.11.2025 (Annexure No. S.A.-1 of the supplementary affidavit) has been executed Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ajay Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Anand Mani Tripathi, Vinay Kumar Pandey Poonam Singh And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) between the parties and the parties are agree for quashing of the proceedings. 6. Learned A.G.A. has no objection with regard to the quashing of the proceedings. 7. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and perusing the record as well as the supplementary affidavit, it is evident that the parties have entered into compromise by way of compromise deed dated 26.11.2025 and the issue has been resolved between the parties. 8. With above observations, this application is allowed. The entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 3356 of 2023 arising out of Case Crime No. 302 of 2023, under Sections 279, 427, 323, 504 I.P.C. and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) SC/ST Act, Police Station- P.G.I., District- Lucknow and the orders dated 16.11.2023, 20.02.2024 including the consequential order dated 20.03.2024 passed by the Special Judge S.C./S.T Act, District-Lucknow are quashed. 9. Office is directed to communicate this order to the trial Court, forthwith. November 26, 2025 Arpan A482 No. 8788 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench