FARHAAD @ FARHAAJ v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/11676/2025 · 2025-12-03
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177476 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177476 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11676 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.442 of 2025, under sections 64, 351(2), 352 BNS, Sections 3/4 POCSO Act, P.S. Biswan, District Sitapur.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that wrong was committed on the victim on false pretext of marriage. It was stated that on various occasions physical relation were formed and when the application refused to marry her on 18.7.2025 and 18.8.2025 the FIR in question came to be lodged on 4.9.2025. In the statement of the victim she stated that she had gone alongwith applicant and on false pretext of marriage physical relation were formed subsequently parents of the applicant refused to marry. The tentative age of the victim is around 18 years.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the fact that physical relation were formed on various occasions, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 20.9.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Farhaad @ Farhaaj be released on bail in aforesaid Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Narendra Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Farhaad @ Farhaaj .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 3, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 11676 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench