Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 177460 (ALL)

SANTOSH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF BASIC EDUCATION AND 6 OTHERS

WPIL/1126/2025 · 2025-11-11

Rajan Roy, Rajeev Bharti

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1126 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. Heard. 2. The ward of the petitioner studies in the very school in respect of which relief has been sought allegedly in public interest. There is a personal interest of the petitioner involved. 3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed with liberty to file a petition as a person aggrieved. November 11, 2025 Shanu/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Kumar Ojha Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ran Vijay Singh (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Santosh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Basic Education And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHANU SUMAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench