SATYENDRA PRATAP SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF STAMP AND REGISTRATION LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/13712/2025 · 2025-11-26
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177453 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177453 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13712 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking mainly for the following relief:-
"I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding/ directing the opposite parties to pay arrears of salary by refixing the pension by granting III-rd Assured Career Progression amending grade pay 4800 to 6600 with interest @ 24% per annum from the date of entitlement i.e. 15.06.2025 till superannuation i.e. 30.06.2022 in a stipulated time, in the interest of justice."
3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.3 i.e. Inspector General Registration, District - Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, - or any other competent authority who shall consider and decide the same within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order.
4. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. November 26, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rishi Kumar Tripathi, Manish Barnwal, Utkarsh Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Satyendra Pratap Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Stamp And Registration Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench