Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17743 (RAJ)

PRIYANSHU SHARMA S/O SHRI SURYA PRAKASH SHARMA v. VINOD SINGH NIRVAN S/O SHRI LEELU SINGH

CW/6852/2025 · 2025-05-06

Anoop Kumar Dhand

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6852/2025 Priyanshu Sharma S/o Shri Surya Prakash Sharma, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Plot No. M-7, Madhuvan Colony, Tonk Phatak, Jaipur, Pin Code No. 302015 ----Petitioner Versus Vinod Singh Nirvan S/o Shri Leelu Singh, R/o Near Rakesh Academy School, Ward No. 22, Water Works Pilani, Pilani (District Jhunjhunu) Pin Code No. 333031, At Present Tenant House No. 32-C, Gopalpura Village (10-B Scheme Ke Pass), Gopalpura Bypass, Jaipur, Pin Code No. 302018 ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Joshi For Respondent(s) : JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 06/05/2025 1. A limited prayer has been made by counsel for petitioner for issuing a direction to the Rent Tribunal No. 1, Jaipur Metropolitan-I (for short, ‘the Tribunal’) to decide the pending application submitted by the petitioner under Section 19-A of the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 (for short, ‘the Act of 2001’) in the original application No. 253/2023. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the arrears of rent amounting to Rs. 14,83,000/- is due against the tenant and the same has not been paid by him, hence under these circumstances, an application under Section 19-A of the Act of 2001 was submitted by the petitioner on 25.01.2024 but inspite of passing of more than 16-17 months, till date, the said application has not (2 of 2) [CW-6852/2025] been decided by the Tribunal, so appropriate direction be issued to the Tribunal to decide the same expeditiously. 3. Considering the limited prayer made by the counsel for the petitioner and looking to the controversy involved in this petition, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of the instant writ petition by issuing a direction to the Tribunal to make all possible endeavor to decide the said application expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order. 4. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/27