HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 5987 of 2018 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Case called out. 2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the State is present. 4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. Consigned to records. December 4, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pt. S. Chandra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Aprajita Bansal, I.P. Singh, Jaiyesh Bhoosreddy (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Ram Avtar Mittal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Cane Dev.And Sugar Industries And .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench