SANJU @ SANJAY KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME DEPTT. U.P. GOVT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
/916/2025 · 2025-12-08
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177414 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177414 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 916 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant; learned AGA for the State and perused the records.
2. The present application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR/Case Crime No.160 of 2017 under section 306 IPC, P.S. Dariyabad, District Barbanki.
3. It is argued that the applicant was granted the benefit of interim anticipatory bail vide order dated 25.08.2025. It is argued that the charge- sheet has been filed and there is nothing on record to show that the applicant did not cooperate with the investigation, as such, the interim bail granted is made absolute till the conclusion of the trial.
4. Thus, the present application for anticipatory bail is accordingly allowed.
5. In the event of applicant Sanju @ Sanjay Kumar surrendering before the trial court, he shall be released on anticipatory bail in aforesaid FIR number till conclusion of the trial on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.30,000/- each separately to the satisfaction of Court below concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Chandan Verma, Anurag Singh, Ishan Bhasin, Tauheed Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sanju @ Sanjay Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Govt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (d) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. December 8, 2025 VNP/- ABAIL No. 916 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench