SMT. VINEETA JAISWAL and ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. and ANOTHER
A482/2354/2018 · 2025-10-31
Rajeev Bharti
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177412 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177412 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2354 of 2018 Court No. - 23 HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. None appears on behalf of the applicant to press this application. Shri Mahendra Pratap Singh, Advocate holding brief of Shri Yugal Kishor Tripathi, learned counsel for respondent no.2 and learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of respondent State are present. It transpires from the order sheet that on previous occasion i.e. on 27.8.2025, a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court has passed a detailed order observing the non appearance of applicant's counsel. In the said order, it was specifically observed by the Court that no further adjournment would be given and the appropriate orders would be passed in absence of applicant's counsel. Today, since none appears on behalf of the applicant and as the matter relates to the year 2018, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. October 31, 2025 Shukla Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manu Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Govt. Advocate, Yugal Kishor Tripathi (Rajeev Bharti,J.) Smt. Vineeta Jaiswal And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench