APHC010243312021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1199/2021 Between: M. Nagaraju Lokeswari Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P V VENKATA RAVI SANKAR and Dr. P.B Reddy Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. SUBBA RAO KORRAPATI The Court made the following order: This Contempt Case is filed Courts Act, 1971 against the respondent for willful disobedience of the order dated 12.04.2019 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.5068 of 2019. 2. Sri Subbarao Korrapati, learned counsel for respondent reiterating the contents of the counter affidavit of the respondent that the order passed by this Court has been complied with by the then Tahsildar vide Endorsement dated IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1199/2021 ...PETITIONER AND ...CONTEMNOR Counsel for the Petitioner: P V VENKATA RAVI SANKAR and Dr. P.B Reddy Counsel for the Contemnor: SUBBA RAO KORRAPATI The Court made the following order: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 against the respondent for willful disobedience of the order dated 12.04.2019 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.5068 of 2019. Sri Subbarao Korrapati, learned counsel for respondent reiterating the contents of the counter affidavit of the respondent, the order passed by this Court has been complied with by the then Endorsement dated 12.09.2019 and assailing the same, the IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI ...PETITIONER ...CONTEMNOR under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 against the respondent for willful disobedience of the order dated 12.04.2019 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.5068 of 2019. Sri Subbarao Korrapati, learned counsel for respondent, while , contended the order passed by this Court has been complied with by the then 12.09.2019 and assailing the same, the 2 Writ Petitioner filed statutory appeal before the Revenue Divisional officer and the same is pending consideration. As such, there is no disobedience as alleged by the petitioner and prayed to close the Contempt Case. 3. To the said submission, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that his client has not informed him about the filing of the appeal before the Revenue Divisional Officer, however prayed to record the contents of the counter and close the Contempt Case. 4. Perusal of the Endorsement issued by the Tahsildar, Tirupati Rural vide D.Dis A/208/2019 dated 12.09.2019 would indicate that pursuant to the orders of this Court in Writ Petition No.5068 of 2019, a notice was issued to the petitioner to attend for enquiry and the Tahsildar, after conducting enquiry and on perusing the documents furnished by the petitioner, has rejected the request of the petitioner for mutation and issuing of pattadar pass books for the subject land. 5. In view of the above, recording the contents of the counter affidavit of the respondent and taking into consideration the Endorsement issued by the Tahsildar, dated 12.09.2019, since the authority has already complied with the directions of this Court in Writ Petition No.5068 of 2019 in the year 2019 itself, there remains nothing for adjudication in the Contempt Case and the Contempt Case is liable to be closed. 3 6. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any in the Contempt Case, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 19.06.2025 MP 4 135 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO:1199 of 2021 Date: 19.06.2025 MP