M/S N. A. ENTERPRISES UNNAO THRU. PROPRIETOR NASRAT ALI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. TAX AND REGISTRATION LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
/1328/2025 · 2025-11-27
Manjive Shukla, Shekhar B Saraf
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177374 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177374 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT TAX No. - 1328 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
2. It appears from the perusal of the show cause notice and reminder notice that the date of filing of the reply is subsequent to the date of hearing in the order. It is to be noted that the date of filing the reply is 31.03.2025, where the date of personal hearing has been fixed on 29.03.2025, 2 days prior to the date of filing of reply.
3. In light of the same, we are of the view that the show cause notice and reminder notice itself is bad and any proceedings that had been initiated on the said basis cannot be allowed to stand in law.
4. Accordingly, the show cause notice and the impugned order are quashed and set aside with liberty granted to the respondent authorities to issue a fresh show cause notice to the petitioner and thereafter proceed in accordance with law.
5. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. November 27, 2025 Ashutosh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Utkarsh Misra, Abhishek Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) M/S N. A. Enterprises Unnao Thru. Proprietor Nasrat Ali .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Tax And Registration Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench