CHAUDHRY ABDUL MUIED KHAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS
CRLP/6340/2024 · 2025-11-11
Pramod Kumar Srivastava, Rajiv Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177359 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177359 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6340 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. At the very outset, learned A.G.A. for the State has point out that in the instant case, the investigation has already been concluded, and the charge sheet has been filed against the petitioner. As such the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the aforesaid fact. In view of the statement made, the present writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. November 11, 2025 Arvind Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhlaq Ali, Shabana Akhlaq Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Chaudhry Abdul Muied Khan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Chief Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench