Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17735 (AP)

K.R. Viswanath, v. Government of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/15962/2020 · 2025-09-08

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010242722020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 15962/2020 Between: 1. K.R. VISWANATH,, S/O. K. SUBBANNA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC. BUILDER, R/O. FLAT NO.107, UPADHYAYA NAGAR, GRAND WORLD ROAD, RADHA GOVINDHAM APARTMENT, THINIPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ALIPIRI POLICE STATION, THIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. M SUNEETHA, W/O M. JAYAKRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, BUSINESS, R/O FLAT NO 101, NADHI PLAZA, NEAR NANDHI CIRCLE, KT ROAD, TIRUPAATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 5. UMA MAHESWARA REDDY, D/O NOT KNOW TO THIS PTR,' AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O FLAT NO 101, NADHI PLAZA, NEAR NANDHI CIRCLE, KT ROAD, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T D PANI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declare the action of Respondent No 3 Is not registering the report dated 03.07.2020 made by Petitioner against the Respondent No.4 and 5 herein Is illegal arbitrary and contrary to the Section 154 of Cr.P.C and in violation of Art 14 21 of Constitution of India and consequently 2 direct the respondent no.3 to register the report dated 03.07.2020” 2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing survives for adjudication in the Writ Petition and the matter has become infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 09.09.2025 Asr 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.15962 of 2020 Dt.09.09.2025 Asr