Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 177349 (ALL)

SMT. MAMTA SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. and ANR.

/1303/2020 · 2025-12-04

Rajeev Bharti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1303 of 2020 Court No. - 23 HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. Case called out. 2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. pertains to the year 2020 and no stay order is operating in this matter. 3. When the matter was called out, none appeared on behalf of the applicant to press this application, nor any request for adjournment or pass over has been made. 4. Learned A.G.A. appearing for the State is present. 5. The application appears to have lost its efficacy due to efflux of time, hence, dismissed. 6. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. December 4, 2025 Renu/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Umesh Chandra Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Rajeev Bharti,J.) Smt. Mamta Srivastava .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And Anr. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- RENU AGARWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench