HAROON KHAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. GOVT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/4584/2024 · 2025-11-25
Rajeev Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177348 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177348 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 4584 of 2024 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
1. Heard.
2. This application has been filed with the following prayer:-
"A. To quash the impugned order dated 19.04.2024 passed by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Lucknow in Criminal Revision No. 325/2023; B. To quash the impugned order dated 25.08.2021 passed by the Court of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lucknow in Criminal Misc. Case No. 6163/2020; C. To direct the P.S.- Hazratganj, District- Lucknow for lodging F.I.R. with respect to the stolen revolver of the applicant; D. To issue suitable directions for taking appropriate action against the officials of PS-Hazratganj, District Lucknow, in light of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, rendered in the case of Lalita Kumari (Supra); E. To pass any other order / direction as is deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the instant case in favour of the Applicant, and F. To allow the costs of the instant application, in favour of the Applicant."
3. In pursuance of earlier order, learned A.G.A. has placed written Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Aviral Raj Singh, Ashutosh Verma, Palash Banerjee, Purnendu Chakravarty, Ritwick Rai, Vaibhav Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Haroon Khan .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Govt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
instructions dated 25.11.2025 duly signed by Mr. Vikas Jaiswal, Assistant Commissioner of Police, Hazratganj, Commissionerate Lucknow alongwith copy of the F.I.R. No. 325 of 2025 u/s 379 I.P.C., Police Station- Hazratganj, District- Lucknow, which are taken on record. Learned A.G.A. informs that aforesaid F.I.R. has already been lodged.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the present application has lost its efficacy.
5. Accordingly, the application is dismissed as infructuous. November 25, 2025 Arpan A482 No. 4584 of 2024 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench