ANKIT YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT LKO AND 4 OTHERS
/13336/2025 · 2025-11-19
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177339 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177339 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13336 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record. Instant petition has been filed with the following reliefs:-
"a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding to Opposite Parties, particularly "The Commissioner, Rural Development Department, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh & District Magistrate, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, to take final decision and pass appropriate order in respect of the representation dated 27.08.2025 contained as Annexure No. 1 to this writ petition. b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Opposite Parties to take decision/decide the representation dated 27.08.2025 sent by the petitioner regarding the compassionate appointment under the Dying in harness Rules & direct to the opposite parties to appoint/provide rojgar under the MANREGA Scheme to the petitioner on any post/ Gram Rojgar Sewak (as per his qualification) which are lying vacant in the department. c) Issue any other writ, order or direction deemed just and proper in the circumstances of the case and in favour of the Petitioner. d) Allow the writ petition with costs in favour of the Petitioner." After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the respondent no. 2 to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 27.08.2025 within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vivek Kumar Singh, Priya Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ankit Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Rural Development Lko And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the contention aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merit of the case, the respondent no.2/Commissioner, Rural Development Department, Lucknow is hereby
directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 27.08.2025, within a period of two months, in accordance with law, from the date, a certified copy of this order is produced before him. With the aforesaid observations, the instant petition is disposed of. November 19, 2025 Mayank WRIA No. 13336 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench