Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17733 (AP)

Jarapala Adilakshmi, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/12537/2025 · 2025-08-17

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010242062025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 12537/2025 Between: 1. JARAPALA ADILAKSHMI,, W/O.CHANDIYA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, CASTE- LAMBADI (ST) 2. JARAPALA CHANDIA,, S/O. LATE BIKSHU NAIK, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, CASTE- LAMBADI (ST), 3. JARAPALA SANTHI,, D/O.CHANDIYA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS. CASTE- LAMBADI (ST), 4. DR. JARAPALA INDIRA,, D/O.CHANDIYA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS. CASTE- LAMBADI (ST), 5. JARAPALA SIDHARTHA,, S/O. CHANDIA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS. CASTE- LAMBADI (ST), PETITIONERS 1 TO 5 ARE RESIDING AT D.NO.3-73, NEAR GURUPRIYA APARTMENT, ANDHRA BANK ROAD, IBRAHIMPATNAM, N.T.R.DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, N.T.R. DISTRICT AT VIJAYAWADA. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, IBRAHIMPATNAM POLICE STATION, IBRAHIMPATNAM, N.T.R. DISTRICT. 4. TULLURI RAJYA LAKSHMI, , W/O. PURUSHOTTAM, AGED ABOUT 48YEARS, R/O. D.NO.2-21/2, RYTHU BAZAR ROAD, IBRAHIMPATNAM, N.T.R. DISTRICT. 5. TULLURI PURUSHOTTAM, S/O. LATE VEERAIAH, AGED ABOUT 53YEARS, R/O. D.NO.2-21/2, RYTHU BAZAR ROAD, IBRAHIMPATNAM, N.T.R. DISTRICT. 6. KARUMANCHI RAVINDRA, S/O. VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 47YEARS, R/O. D.NO.3-25, ANDHRA BANK ROAD, NEAR GURUPRIYA APARTMENTS, IBRAHIMPATNAM, N.T.R. DISTRICT. 7. KARUMANCHI SURENDRA, S/O. VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 46YEARS, R/O. D.NO.3-25, ANDHRA BANK ROAD, NEAR GURUPRIYA APARTMENTS, IBRAHIMPATNAM, N.T.R. DISTRICT. 8. KARUMANCHI VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O. NOT KNOWN. AGED ABOUT 65YEARS, R/O. D.NO.3-25, ANDHRA BANK ROAD, NEAR GURUPRIYA APARTMENTS, IBRAHIMPATNAM, N.T.R. DISTRICT. 9. KARUMANCHI PUSHPAVATHI, W/O. VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.3-25, ANDHRA BANK ROAD, NEAR GURUPRIYA APARTMENTS, IBRAHIMPATNAM, N.T.R. DISTRICT. 10. KARUMANCHI LAKSHMI TIRUPATHAMMA, D/O. VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 34YEARS, R/O. D.NO.3-25, ANDHRA BANK ROAD, NEAR GURUPRIYA APARTMENTS, IBRAHIMPATNAM, N.T.R. DISTRICT. 11. RAVULA LAKSHMI TIRUPATHAMMA, W/O. HARI KRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 48YEARS, R/O. D.NO.3-72, ANDHRA BANK ROAD, NEAR GURUPRIYA APARTMENTS, IBRAHIMPATNAM, N.T.R. DISTRICT. 12. M SRIDEVI, W/O. M.PRASAD, AGED ABOUT 55YEARS, R/O. RYTHU BAZAR ROAD IBRAHIMPATNAM, N.T.R. DISTRICT. 13. M RAMA DEVI, W/O. M.SRINIVASA RAO, AGED ABOUT 40YEARS, R/O. D.NO.2-102, ANDHRA BANK ROAD, NEAR GURUPRIYA APARTMENTS, IBRAHIMPATNAM, N.T.R. DISTRICT. 14. R LATHA, W/O. R.SRINIVASA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.3-72, SRI NAILAYAM, NEAR GURUPRIYA APARTMENTS, ANDHRA BANK ROAD, IBRAHIMPATNAM, N.T.R. DISTRICT. 15. SHAIK NISHAT BHANU, W/O. GOUSE, AGED ABOUT 34YEARS, R/O. D.NO.2-21/2, RYTHU BAZAR ROAD, IBRAHIMPATNAM, N.T.R. DISTRICT. 16. BEPALA PADMA, W/O. RAMULU, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.2-21, NEAR GURUPRIYA APARTMENTS ANDHRA BANK ROAD, IBRAHIMPATNAM, N.T.R. DISTRICT. 17. PAIDIPATI CHENNAMMA, W/O. KASAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O. NEAR GURUPRIYA APARTMENTS ANDHRA BANK ROAD, IBRAHIMPATNAM, N.T.R. DISTRICT. 18. K KUSUMA, W/O. NOT KNOWN. AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O. NEAR GURUPRIYA APARTMENTS ANDHRA BANK ROAD, IBRAHIMPATNAM, N.T.R. DISTRICT. 19. VEMULA LAKSHMI, W/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O. NEAR GURUPRIYA APARTMENTS, ANDHRA BANK ROAD, IBRAHIMPATNAM, N.T.R. DISTRICT. 20. UPPU LAKSHMI TIRUPATHAMMA, W/O. NOT KNOWN. AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O. NEAR GURUPRIYA APARTMENTS ANDHRA BANK ROAD, IBRAHIMPATNAM, N.T.R. DISTRICT. 21. UPPU LAKSHMI, W/O. NOT KNOWN. AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/O. NEAR GURUPRIYA APARTMENTS ANDHRA BANK ROAD, IBRAHIMPATNAM, N.T.R. DISTRICT. 22. B RANI, W/O. B.MURA HARI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O. NEAR GURUPRIYA APARTMENTS, ANDHRA BANK ROAD, IBRAHIMPATNAM, N.T.R. DISTRICT. 23. B MURA HARI REDDY, S/O. NOT KNOWN. AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O. NEAR GURUPRIYA APARTMENTS, ANDHRA BENK ROAD, IBRAHIMPATNAM, N.T.R. DISTRICT. 24. P DEEPIKA, W/O. NOT KNOWN. AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O. NEAR GURUPRIYA APARTMENTS ANDHRA BANK ROAD, IBRAHIMPATNAM, N.T.R. DISTRICT. 25. S VIJAYA, W/O. NOT KNOWN. AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O. NEAR GURUPRIYA APARTMENTS, ANDHRA BANK ROAD, IBRAHIMPATNAM, N.T.R. DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the inaction on the part of the respondents, particularly the 3rd respondent, to provide police protection to safeguard petitioners life, liberty, and dignity, despite submitting a petition dated 18.03.2025, seeking immediate police protection against persistent harassment, threats, and caste-based discrimination by the respondents 4 to 25, as illegal, irregular, irrational and amounts to non discharge of legal obligation conferred on the part of 3rd respondent and offends Article 14, 19 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 3 to provide immediate police protection to petitioners and ensure their safety and to conduct a fair, impartial, and independent investigation into the allegations of harassment, caste-based discrimination, and threats made by respondents 4 to 25 against the petitioners, ensuring that appropriate action is taken against the perpetrators under the relevant provisions of law, including the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to provide immediate and adequate police protection to the petitioners at their residence D.No.3-73, Andhra Bank Road, Ibrahimpatnam, N.T.R.District to ensure their safety and security from the threats and harassment by respondents 4 to 25, pending disposal of the main writ petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SUBRAHMANYAM KOTARI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 12537 of 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the inaction on the part of the respondents, particularly the 3rd respondent, to provide police protection to safeguard petitioners’ life, liberty, and dignity, despite submitting a petition dated 18.03.2025, seeking immediate police protection against persistent harassment, threats, and caste- based discrimination by the respondent Nos.4 to 25, as illegal, irregular, irrational and amounts to non discharge of legal obligation conferred on the part of 3rd respondent and offends Article 14, 19 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 3 to provide immediate police protection to petitioners and ensure their safety and to conduct a fair, impartial, and independent investigation into the allegations of harassment, caste-based discrimination, and threats made by respondent Nos.4 to 25 against the petitioners, ensuring that appropriate action is taken against the perpetrators under the relevant provisions of law, including the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and pass…” 2. Heard Sri Subrhamanyam Kotari, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. When the matter was taken up for hearing, Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents, on written instructions would submit that the respondent-Police have made an enquiry dated 18.03.2025, on the allegation made by the petitioner Nos.1 to 5 and found that the said allegation is false. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 5. Recording the above said submission, the Writ petition is disposed of. However, the petitioners are at liberty to work out his remedies before the appropriate forum. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 18.08.2025. SRT HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.12537 of 2025 Dated.18.08.2025 SRT 146