RAVI PRAJAPATI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. THE PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
/1858/2025 · 2025-11-19
Brij Raj Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177310 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177310 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1858 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. Power filed by Shri Nijam Ahmad, Advocate on behalf of opposite party no.2 is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and perused the record. The present application has been filed with the following main prayer:
"Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the entire proceedings of S.C./S.T. No.126 of 2025; State Versus Ravi Prajapati, arising out of Case Crime No.278 of 2024, under sections- 137 (2), 87 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (B.N.S.), 2023, and Sections 3 (2) (v), 3(2) (v-a) of S.C.S.T. Act, relating to the Police Station-Alapur, District- Ambedkar Nagar, pending in the Court of learned Special Judge, S.C./S.T. Act, Ambedkar Nagar, as well as impugned chargesheet no.234/24, dated 25.12.2024, submitted by the Investigating Officer against the petitioner in aforesaid case crime number, as contained in Annexure no.1 to the instant petition, in the light of compromise, attained between the parties, in the interest of law and justice."
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the parties have amicably settled their dispute and a compromise has been arrived between them dated 13.10.2025 (Original copy of the same is appended as annexure No.7 to the application). Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Niyaj Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ravi Prajapati .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the Court below, before which, the case is pending. Therefore, the compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court below itself. Counsel for opposite party no. 2 has no objection, in case compromise takes place. Both the parties are directed to appear before the concerned court within two weeks from today and file/pursue their compromise application. The court below is directed to pass an order on the said compromise application and all formalities will be completed within eight weeks from that date. Accordingly, the present application stands disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it or has been already filed, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. The court in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicant to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. For a period of three months, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case. Registry is directed to return the original copy of the compromise deed to the
learned counsel for the applicant after taking photocopy of the same. November 19, 2025 Sachin NA528 No. 1858 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MEHROTRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench