[2025:RJ-JP:21545] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 415/2025 In S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No.4728/2024 Goutam Kumar Son Of Shri Netram Patel, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of Village Pachlangi, Udaipurwati, District Neemkathana (Raj.) Changed District Jhunjhunu. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Shri Sharad Choudhary, Superintendent Of Police, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. 2. Shri Kastur Varma, S.h.o. Police Station Udaipurwati, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.). 3. Keshav Kumar S/o Shri Jagdish Prasad Nai, Resident Of Pachlangi, Udaipurwati, District Neem Ka Thana, Raj. 4. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Personal, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arpan Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI Order 22/05/2025 This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 215 of the Constitution of India alleging therein that the order dated 29.07.2024 passed by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, in S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No.4728/2024 wherein the petitioner was directed to join the investigation in F.I.R. No. 216/2024 registered at Police Station Udaipurwati, District Neem- Ka-Thana and the respondent authority was also directed not to [2025:RJ-JP:21545] (2 of 2) [CCP-415/2025] take any coercive action against the petitioner, has not been complied with. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after investigation, a Final Report has been filed in a negative form before the learned Trial Court but the Investigating Officer is still harassing to the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, perused the order dated 29.07.2024 and considered the Final Report, which is submitted in Negative Form. It is also clear from the record that the petitioner was arrested in respect of F.I.R. No. 91/2025 and not in the pursuant to the F.I.R. 216/2024 registered at Police Station Udaipurwati, District Neem-Ka-Thana. Looking to the overall facts & circumstances of the case and considering the submissions made at bar, no case is made out for the Contempt of Court. Consequently, the present contempt petition is dismissed. Notice(s), if any stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J SAURABH /14