HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10207 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record. The instant application has been filed by the applicant to permit him to submit two sureties and one personal bond for all five cases from the applicant and applicant has been granted bail in all cases by the court below. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in all five cases. He next submitted that in all the cases registered against the applicant, he has been granted bail by the court below. He says that the applicant is very poor person and not in a position to furnish huge sureties in each and every case in compliance of bail orders. It is further submitted that the details of cases registered against applicant in District-Sultanpur are as follows:- (1) Case Crime No. 365 of 2025 Under Sections 109 B.N.S. 2023 and 3/5/25/27 Arms Act, Police Station-Lambhua (2) Case Crime No. 357 of 2025 Under Sections 303 (2)/317 (2) B.N.S. 2023 Police Station-Lambhua, (3) Case Crime No. 259 of 2023 Under Sections 380/413 I.P.C. Police Station- Motigarpur, (4) Case Crime No. 495 of 2023 Under Sections 379 I.P.C. Police Station-Kadipur, (5) Case Crime No. 343 of 2025 Under Sections 303 (3)/317 (2) B.N.S. 2023 Police Station-Chanda, Learned counsel for the applicant has relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court passed in Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No. 8914-8915 of 2018; Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Vs. State of U.P. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vinod Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ravindra Verma .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) Learned A.G.A. submits that he does not want to file any counter affidavit. In view of the facts and circumstances as well as rival submissions advanced by the learned counsel for both the parties, the present application stands disposed of finally in the light law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky (Supra) and the Court below is directed to execute the personal bond of Rs. 20,000/- in every case and produce two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court/Magistrate concerned in one case which shall hold good for rest of the cases. December 4, 2025 Jyoti/- A482 No. 10207 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench