IMAMUDDIN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
BAIL/12978/2024 · 2025-11-04
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177299 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 177299 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12978 of 2024
Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.322 of 2024, under Section 69, 351(2) BNS & Section 67 of IT Act, P.S. Raniganj, District Pratapgarh.
3. In terms of the FIR it was alleged that the applicant had committed wrong on her and had also threatened. It was also stated that on various occasions, physical relations were formed on the false pretext of marriage and on the threat of making the video viral. In the statement under Section 180 BNSS, the victim admitted that she used to talk to the applicant and physical relations were formed on various occasions and subsequently, the video was forwarded to the husband of the victim. Age of the victim is around 26 years.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the fact that the relationship continued for over a span of 2 years, the applicant who is in custody since 04.10.2024 and has no criminal antecedents, is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Imamuddin be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shesh Mani, Gyan Singh, Km. Deepa, Manjari Singh, Vikrant Prakash Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Imamuddin .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 4, 2025 nishant BAIL No. 12978 of 2024 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench