HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 2818 of 2024 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J. 1.Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A for the State. 2. This Court had passed the following order on 23.04.2024:- "Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. By means of this petition, the petitioner has sought quashing of F.I.R. dated 10.04.2024, bearing Case Crime/FIR No.0342 of 2024, for the offence under Sections 186,353,392,504 I.P.C., registered at Police Station Kotwali, District Barabanki. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. The petitioner has never taken the G.D. The F.I.R. itself shows that the G.D. was available with the Police after 10.00 p.m. The case for consideration is made out. Let counter affidavit be filed by the opposite parties within three weeks. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may also be filed within one week thereafter. List after four weeks. Considering the submissions made, it is provided that the petitioner shall not be arrested on the basis of the impugned First Information Report, unless and until there is sufficient and cogent evidence available against her regarding commission of the offence. She shall get her statement recorded before the Police as and when she is called. If he does not do so, then it can be made a ground for seeking vacation of this interim order". 3. Learned A.G.A. on the basis of instructions dated 27.10.2025 received from Sri Sunil Kumar, Sub Inspector, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Barabanki, submits that charge-sheet no.360 of 2024 dated 22.06.2024 has been forwarded to the court on 18.07.2025,therefore, this Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajai Kumar Singh, Piyush Gupta, Poornima Raj, Prabhat Rathore, Shobhit Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Smt. Rubi Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home And Others .....Respondent(s) petition has lost its efficacy. 4. Faced with above, learned counsel for petitioner submits that this petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to avail appropriate remedy available under law, to which, there is no objection to the other side. 5. The petition is accordingly dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. November 4, 2025 Shahnaz CRLP No. 2818 of 2024 2 (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHAHNAZ BANO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench