Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 177252 (ALL)

RADHIKA SINGH PNO. 112620295 v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/12678/2025 · 2025-10-30

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12678 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned state counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed challenging transfer order dated 4th November, 2023 so far as it relates to petitioner as well as relieving order dated 28th November, 2024. 3. At the very outset learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner joined at the transferred place in pursuance of relieving order but is facing personal difficulties in continuance at the said place. 4. For the aforesaid grievance, petitioner submits that he may be granted liberty to furnish a fresh representation before authorities concerned. 5. Considering innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner without entering into merits of the case and without interfering with the impugned orders, liberty is granted to petitioner to make a fresh representation before opposite party No. 2 i.e. Deputy Inspector General of Police Karmik Police Head Quarter, Lucknow or any other competent authority. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided sympathetically within a period of four weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority. 6. The petition stands disposed of. October 30, 2025 prabhat Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anupam Shukla, Jay Vardhan Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Radhika Singh Pno. 112620295 .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench