- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:6321 WP No. 41643 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 41643 OF 2017 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. PUSHPALATHA @ ANKITHA KAVYA GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, W/O. B.C. RAVI KUMAR RESIDING AT SY NO.48/7, B.S. DODDI VILLAGE & POST, HORALAGALLU POST, KASABA HOBLI, KANAKAPURA TALUK - 562 117 RAMANAGARA DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRAKASH T.HEBBAR, ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, ENERGY DEPARTMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE BENGALURU ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED, (WHOLLY OWNED GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA UNDERTAKING), GENERAL MANAGER (ELE), DSM, CORPORATE OFFICE, BESCOM, K.R.CIRCLE BENGALURU - 560 001. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:6321 WP No. 41643 of 2017 3. THE BENGALURU ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPNAY LIMITED, (WHOLLY OWNED GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA UNDERTAKING), MANAGING DIRECTOR, DSM, CORPORATE OFFICE, BESCOM, K.R.CIRCLE, BENGALURU - 560 001. 4. THE CHIEF ENGINEER (E) BRAZ, BESCOM, NO.12/34, INDUSTRIAL ESTATE RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 444. 5. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER (ELE), RAMANAGARA CIRCLE, BESCOM, TTMC BUILDING, KENGERI BUS STOP, BENGALURU - 560 060. 6. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (ELE), C, O&M, KANAKAPURA, BESCOM, SANGAMA ROAD, KANAKAPURA - 562 117. RAMANAGARA DISTRICT. 7. THE KARNATAKA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSIONER, 6TH AND 7TH FLOOR, MAHALAKSHMI CHAMBERS, NO.9/2, MG ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATH RAYAPPA, AGA FOR R1; SRI. P. PRASANNA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-3, 4 AND 6; SMT. ARUNDATI., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. B.L.MAYANNA., ADVOCATE R7; SRI. RAKESH BHATT., ADVOCATE R2 & 5 (VC) ) - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:6321 WP No. 41643 of 2017 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen form the daily order sheet, petition was listed on 27.01.2025, on that day, when the matter is called, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, for appearance of counsel for the petitioner, the petition was ordered to be listed on 12.02.2025. The petition is listed today for appearance of counsel for the petitioner. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 22