HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 788 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Case called out. 2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the State is present. 4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. Consigned to records. November 11, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ghaus Beg Counsel for Respondent(s) : Chandra Shekhar Pandey, Krishna Kumar Pandey, Ratnesh Chandra (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Smt. Ramo Devi .....Petitioner(s) Managing Director U.P. State Road Transport Corporation Andors .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench